top of page
Search

Imported Produce Is Cheaper—But At What Cost?

  • Writer: Jason Adelaars
    Jason Adelaars
  • Nov 16
  • 3 min read

Walk through any grocery store and look at the origin labels on your fruits and vegetables: Mexico, Peru, Chile, Guatemala. Each year, the United States relies more heavily on imported produce because it simply costs less to grow abroad. But the question worth asking is why it’s cheaper—and whether that bargain comes with hidden costs we’ll be paying for later.


The answer is uncomfortable. It absolutely does.


A major reason imported produce is inexpensive is that many exporting countries still allow pesticides that American farmers are no longer permitted to use—chemicals banned here because of the risks they pose to human health or the environment. The U.S. technically requires imported produce to meet our safety limits, but only a tiny fraction—often just one to two percent—of imports are actually tested. Most foreign growers try to meet American standards, but when regulations are weaker and testing is limited, the risk doesn’t disappear. It simply shifts onto the consumer, quietly and invisibly.


Labor plays an equally large role. American farms must follow strict worker protections, fair-wage laws, chemical-handling rules, and environmental standards. Farms in much of Central and South America don’t operate under the same set of expectations or enforcement. Lower wages, fewer safeguards, and cheaper compliance drive down the cost of production. None of this is a moral indictment of other countries—it’s the economic reality that makes imported produce appear so inexpensive. But the savings at the register don’t come from nowhere.


And if this dynamic feels familiar, it should. The United States did the same thing with manufacturing. For decades, we chased lower costs overseas and hollowed out our own industrial capacity. It felt efficient in the moment—until the long-term consequences became undeniable: fragile supply chains, loss of domestic expertise, and a dependence on foreign labor and foreign policies that we suddenly realized we couldn’t control. Now we’re repeating the very same mistake with something far more fundamental than electronics or appliances: our food.


Imported abundance creates the illusion of stability. Grocery shelves look full, so we assume the system is strong. But the reality is that our fresh food supply now depends on foreign water, foreign labor, foreign climate stability, and thousands of miles of transportation. A heatwave in Mexico, a drought in Peru, a labor disruption in Chile—none of these events feel connected to everyday American shoppers, yet every one of them lands directly on our kitchen tables through higher prices or empty shelves. This isn’t resilience. It’s exposure.


But there’s another way forward—one that doesn’t require blame or nationalism, but simply a smarter design for our food system. Local agriculture, especially modern controlled-environment agriculture, offers a path back to stability. With automated hydroponic systems, data-driven growing methods, and year-round indoor production, we can grow high-quality produce anywhere, regardless of climate or season. We can grow it without pesticides. We can grow it using 90% less water. And we can grow it under the same labor and safety standards we hold for every other industry within our borders.


This is the vision behind Credible Hydroponics: putting food production back in the hands of local growers, so communities aren’t dependent on a fragile global chain they can’t see and can’t influence. Our mission is simple—grow food locally, grow it safely, grow it with integrity. No 2,000-mile supply chains. No questionable labor practices. No reliance on foreign regulations that may or may not match our expectations. Just honest, transparent, pesticide-free produce grown right where people live.


Because at the end of the day, imported produce will always look cheap. But the hidden costs—chemical uncertainty, environmental shortcuts, labor exploitation, and supply chain brittleness—never show up on the price tag. And as we learned from offshoring our manufacturing, you get what you pay for. Chasing the lowest cost can quietly dismantle the very systems we depend on.


We can’t afford to repeat that mistake with our food.


The solution isn’t isolation. It’s empowerment. It’s giving Americans the tools, technology, and knowledge to grow locally again—not on massive industrial farms, but on small, distributed, community-scale systems that are resilient, clean, and built for the future.


That’s what Credible Hydroponics is here to build. And it starts with one simple idea: our food should come from people we trust, not supply chains we can’t see

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
There's Still a Grower in All of Us

Someone said to me recently that automation is trying to "take the farmer out of farming." I don’t believe that. Data, sensors, and...

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page